 | | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) I actually think "lame focus group" is a perfectly good explanation. Focus groups seem to result in plenty of abominations that happen to have tested well -- if not necessarily in a well-designed test. I didn't find the color palette (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) You know what I think is really funny about all the griping about these new Lego colours? As soon as we find out that TLC *does* change its mind, and returns to the old colours, (and understand I'm not saying that they have or will!) everyone (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) I wonder if most Lego fans aren't truly happy unless they have something to complain about.... Cheers Richie (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
David, You make good points in your post. 1. This one is not: (...) As for me (and i think for a lot of people) you are *very* wrong. Are you saying we just want a color or a part because it is rare? Not me. I don't care if a part is rare, i care if (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) Richie, You're speaking for yourself right? There a lot of people here that are talking for theirselfs but trying to input that on others. And at least, there are two on this tread already. Doesn't seem very reasonable to me. I think we should (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) Sure. New colors are good. What's bad is getting rid of *key* old ones. (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
