Subject:
|
Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:17:38 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdmNOSPAM.org
|
Viewed:
|
5445 times
|
| |
|
|
David Schilling <davidNO@SPAMsunteleia.com> wrote:
> colours? As soon as we find out that TLC *does* change its mind, and
> returns to the old colours, (and understand I'm not saying that they
> have or will!) everyone will scramble to get the few sets that have the
> new colours in them, since then they will suddenly become *rare*
> colours, and hence very desirable. In fact, I'd predict that the very
Sure. New colors are good. What's bad is getting rid of *key* old ones.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
| (...) You know what I think is really funny about all the griping about these new Lego colours? As soon as we find out that TLC *does* change its mind, and returns to the old colours, (and understand I'm not saying that they have or will!) everyone (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
56 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
