 | | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) Thank you Greg. I agree with you. TLC seems to be avoiding this question, which is really frustrating. -Anne (21 years ago, 12-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
Hi Anne, glad there are people out there who feel the same way I do and are not afraid to say so. TLC has made zero effort with regards to the color change issue. Simply posting that garbage about the color pallette and then dropping the issue is (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) Why should I be? I give them money. Since I have a choice on what I pay for, I have a right to open my big mouth and say something :) (...) I couldn't agree more. I couldn't tell you how upset I was about the whole thing. It was enough to (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
Well you can mark an X next to my name and put me on the 'unhappy' list! I like the old grays. Someday people will be buying Lego collections on ebay just to get the old colors......... (21 years ago, 13-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) I think what Greg might have been referring to is the disparaging remarks from some other folks here (who aren't bothered by the color issue) who find it necessary to characterize those who feel otherwise as "whiners" or "complainers". FWIW, (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) I don't mind new colors in new sets. But I do dislike what the changes mean for reissues of old sets. I was looking forward to reissues of sets like 6080 down the line. But even if that happens, it will look less like a light gray building and (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) Me too. I've resisted buying the new colors, but I just started building a set I got as a gift and a couple of things struck me. I just don't buy the lame focus group / crisper pallette explanation. The implementation is just too hurried and (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) I actually think "lame focus group" is a perfectly good explanation. Focus groups seem to result in plenty of abominations that happen to have tested well -- if not necessarily in a well-designed test. I didn't find the color palette (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) You know what I think is really funny about all the griping about these new Lego colours? As soon as we find out that TLC *does* change its mind, and returns to the old colours, (and understand I'm not saying that they have or will!) everyone (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) I wonder if most Lego fans aren't truly happy unless they have something to complain about.... Cheers Richie (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
David, You make good points in your post. 1. This one is not: (...) As for me (and i think for a lot of people) you are *very* wrong. Are you saying we just want a color or a part because it is rare? Not me. I don't care if a part is rare, i care if (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) Richie, You're speaking for yourself right? There a lot of people here that are talking for theirselfs but trying to input that on others. And at least, there are two on this tread already. Doesn't seem very reasonable to me. I think we should (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
|
(...) Sure. New colors are good. What's bad is getting rid of *key* old ones. (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
