 | | Re: The Future of Trains —Tommy Armstrong
| | | | (...) Yes, I am aware that "y'all" does have some connotations--but have decided that it is really the only politically correct, all encompassing, non-gender, non-racial, non-religious specfic pronoun that is available in the English language-at (...) (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The Future of Trains —Duane Collicott
| | | | | | (...) If you go far enough north it isn't! They also use the other variant, youse guyses, as in, "You got da deep snow over to youse guyses place, eh?" to which the response would be, "Ya, sure, but we cleared da path to da sauna!" (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Future of Trains —Steve Bliss
| | | | | | | (...) :) And don't forget, 'sauna' is a three-syllable word. The 'u' is not silent! Steve (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Future of Trains —Orion Pobursky
| | | | | (...) Actually "guys" is a gender neutral term: (URL) definition 3 entry 3b -Orion (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | | |
