To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / 3745
3744  |  3746
Subject: 
Re: The Future of Trains
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:57:19 GMT
Viewed: 
20994 times
  
In lugnet.lego, Tommy Armstrong wrote:
"You guys" is unacceptable as gender specific,

Actually "guys" is a gender neutral term:
http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary/guy definition 3 entry 3b

-Orion



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Future of Trains
 
(...) Yes, I am aware that "y'all" does have some connotations--but have decided that it is really the only politically correct, all encompassing, non-gender, non-racial, non-religious specfic pronoun that is available in the English language-at (...) (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)  

124 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR