 | | Re: The Future of Trains —Duane Collicott
|
| | | (...) I have to throw something in here... Tommy probably doesn't realize this (and I'm probably breaking some rule by telling him), but those of us up heah yonder Nawth sometimes use words like "y'all" in a condescending, rednecky way. But for (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: dnecks (was Re: The Future of Trains) —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | (...) Are ya'll makin fun of us purebread (not imbred as you may suspect) good ole' country boys? Don't make me call up Roy D. Murcer to come whoop your ... :P -Rob FUT - o-t.fun (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains —Tommy Armstrong
|
| | | | (...) Yes, I am aware that "y'all" does have some connotations--but have decided that it is really the only politically correct, all encompassing, non-gender, non-racial, non-religious specfic pronoun that is available in the English language-at (...) (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Future of Trains —Duane Collicott
|
| | | | | (...) If you go far enough north it isn't! They also use the other variant, youse guyses, as in, "You got da deep snow over to youse guyses place, eh?" to which the response would be, "Ya, sure, but we cleared da path to da sauna!" (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Future of Trains —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) :) And don't forget, 'sauna' is a three-syllable word. The 'u' is not silent! Steve (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Future of Trains —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) Actually "guys" is a gender neutral term: (URL) definition 3 entry 3b -Orion (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
