Subject:
|
Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Dec 2004 04:28:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
11496 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:
| |
In lugnet.lego, David Eaton wrote:
| |
In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:
| |
And on the other side of the coin many want to defend the company no matter
what they do. SNIP
|
Being a relative moralist, I judge by intent. Lego’s intent was to give us
as much as they could of the remaining Maersk blue. Because they wanted to
make money from us. If they could’ve found a way to make more without
spending additional money on Maersk blue at the time, they would’ve. Their
intent was NOT to make a limited collector’s item. All of a sudden, presto,
they got their wish. Their intent never changed.
|
The end justifies the means?
|
How did you get “ends justify the means” out of that? Wouldn’t “ends justify the
means” imply that it was their intent all along to lie to us? Isn’t that
precisely NOT what I said?
| |
| |
If their intent before had been to make a very-limited-quantity set, just to
watch us fall all over each other grabbing for sets, and now they decided to
make a second run to try it again, then yeah, I’d be on your side. Although
admittedly not as vehemently as you seem to be.
|
If their intent wasn’t so then why did they present it as so?
|
They didn’t. You seem to think they did, though. I admit they made a mistake in
that one statement where they said it was our last chance to buy Maersk blue.
But I’m capable of forgiving an innocent mistake. Are you?
| |
If this wasn’t part of a trend I have nothing to say. I find the color a
curiosity, nothing I love. Nor am I an investor. The only stake I have in it
is the over-all picture.-Ken
|
So fight the trend, not this. Fight the problems, don’t nitpick where it doesn’t
help.
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) SNIP (...) They also said there would only be 10,000 availible publicly. They said it through Jake, SHO, and press releases. Kind'a hard to misread that statment. (...) If it ws just a matter of forgiving a simple mistake and not part of a (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) SNIP (...) The end justifies the means? (...) If their intent wasn't so then why did they present it as so? (...) If this wasn't part of a trend I have nothing to say. I find the color a curiosity, nothing I love. Nor am I an investor. The (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
