To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / 2968
2967  |  2969
Subject: 
Re: 10152 Update
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego
Date: 
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:27:29 GMT
Viewed: 
9357 times
  
In lugnet.lego, Burkhard Schloemer wrote:
In lugnet.lego, Kelly McKiernan wrote:
Actually, the core question is more directly this: Should LEGO customers feel
entitled to tell LEGO how to conduct their business? Unfortunately, several
people here believe they do feel so entitled,

Oh dear. You are really stubborn, Kelly, as well as persistent in seeing things
from upside down.

I agree that some here are stubborn and some here are seeing things all topsy
turvy, yes. Where I differ with you, though, is in the identification of which
group of people that appelation belongs to, and which group it doesn't belong
to. We may have to agree to disagree though, as I'm not sure that reason or
logic is likely to change your mind.

That said... I'd like to pose a thought starter question to everyone...

Has everyone said everything they want to say about this topic? Are there any
new ideas or new arguments in need of being made?

If you, dear reader, think that you don't have any new ideas to add, or new
arguments to make, because you can see that they've all been satisfactorily
made, consider using the link that takes you to the next post, rather than the
link that starts a reply.

Just a thought.



Message has 3 Replies:
  A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
 
(...) Thank You, Larry. I hate to add one more post to this thread, but feel the need. I totally agree with what you say about everyone just stopping. But, I think this thread is a real eye-opener as to the nature of this community. Is this really (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, FTX)
  Re: 10152 Update
 
(...) Ooooh, you'd be surprised, Larry! Actually I would happily share your point of view - if I had a perfectly sound reason to do so. Say, about 80 bucks burning a hole in my pocket and an empty shelf that would perfectly fit a Maersk ship? That (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
  Re: 10152 Update
 
(...) You're right Larry, this is a perfect point to stop, as the thread has devolved from relatively restrained (albeit heated) to snotty. The reaction of the community to this issue is certainly something to think about. I'll bow out now and move (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 10152 Update
 
(...) Oh dear. You are really stubborn, Kelly, as well as persistent in seeing things from upside down. Imagine, just for a moment, somebody tells you one thing, then does the exact opposite. You're following so far? Great. So, wouldn't you be (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)  

257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR