Subject:
|
Re: Multiple numbers for same set (was: 10152 Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 04:59:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8696 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.lego, Kelly McKiernan wrote:
| |
At the risk of belaboring a point, renumbering a set is something collectors
want, not necessarily something LEGO would want or need. In fact, adding a
new number for the identical set would probably be counterproductive in the
long run for the company.
|
Well I guess they have an example they can use as a test case now:
As far as I know, there is no difference between these sets except the
number. I don’t own 8438 so can’t say definitively.
|
They do look identical. Wonder why they have three numbers? Might be a good
question for Jake at some point. Thanks for correcting that, Ross.
I’ll stick by my other assertions about the set, though!
Kelly
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Multiple numbers for same set (was: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) Well I guess they have an example they can use as a test case now: [LEGOSet 8460] [LEGOSet 8431] [LEGOSet 8438] As far as I know, there is no difference between these sets except the number. I don't own 8438 so can't say definitively. ROSCO (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
