Subject:
|
Re: 10152 Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:06:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7921 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, J. Spencer Rezkalla wrote:
| |
In lugnet.lego, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.lego, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
Personally I’m not sure I have a lot of sympathy for collectors that want
to buy up multiple copies of a new set and thus make it harder for others
to get copies. (Precious Princess, call your office!) Or for collectors
that make decisions about what they collect based on percieved scarcity.
Collect because you like the set!
|
Irrelevant. TLC made a promise. They are willfully breaking that promise.
|
Wait, I’m lost here. Can someone please point me to where Lego promised (in
writing) that they would never reintroduce this set? Or did they simply say
(at the time) that there wasn’t a business case to produce more 10152 once
their original supply of Maersk was exhausted?
Spencer
|
Well put Spencer. I want to see that as well.
By the way, I posted a message to .off-topic but forgot to FTX it. If you have
time go read it. It concerns my take on collectibles and collecting in general.
“What Makes A Collectible”
Steven Weiser
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Wait, I'm lost here. Can someone please point me to where Lego promised (in writing) that they would never reintroduce this set? Or did they simply say (at the time) that there wasn't a business case to produce more 10152 once their original (...) (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
