Subject:
|
Re: 10152 Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:48:53 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
7666 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.lego, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
Personally I’m not sure I have a lot of sympathy for collectors that want to
buy up multiple copies of a new set and thus make it harder for others to
get copies. (Precious Princess, call your office!) Or for collectors that
make decisions about what they collect based on percieved scarcity. Collect
because you like the set!
|
Irrelevant. TLC made a promise. They are willfully breaking that promise.
|
Wait, I’m lost here. Can someone please point me to where Lego promised (in
writing) that they would never reintroduce this set? Or did they simply say (at
the time) that there wasn’t a business case to produce more 10152 once their
original supply of Maersk was exhausted?
Spencer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Well put Spencer. I want to see that as well. By the way, I posted a message to .off-topic but forgot to FTX it. If you have time go read it. It concerns my take on collectibles and collecting in general. "What Makes A Collectible" Steven (...) (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Irrelevant. TLC made a promise. They are willfully breaking that promise. (...) Perhaps, but that still doesn't change the fact that TLC is purposefully breaking their word. And unnecessarily so. Why not use the extra Maersk blue pellets for a (...) (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
