 | | Re: 10152 Update —Johannes Koehler
| | | | Hello! (...) You totally missed the point, Chris. The ship was already announced to be re-released in dark blue which would have made it in no respect a less great set for kids and anybody who simply enjoys building it. While on the other hand (...) (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 10152 Update —Chris Leach
| | | | | | (...) Hey JoJo ..Yes I know it was going to be rereleased in the dk blue(I voted for green I think) but there were plenty of folks who bought it not because it was limited and wanted a collectors item but with the intention to make a profit off of (...) (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 10152 Update —William R. Ward
| | | | | In lugnet.lego, Johannes Koehler wrote: ... While on the other (...) I applaud any effort by TLC to spoil the efforts of speculators to profit from the scarcity of a set. I wish they would rerelease monorail, Classic Space, and a bunch of other (...) (20 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 10152 Update —Fredrik Nyman
| | | | | Why can't LEGO do both, and keep almost everyone happy? That is, LEGO gets to re-release any set, as long as the box is physically different from the original. That way, sets remain collectible, but bricks don't. "Bill Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote (...) (20 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | | |
