Subject:
|
Re: Color Change - Final Update - Track
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 May 2004 17:20:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
640 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> LEGO doesn't owe you (or any other consumer) anything merely because you bought
> stuff from them in the past, unless you had some specific contract.
That's your point of view - the consumer buys a product from LEGO.
Other's point of view - the consumer buys a product from LEGO which
belongs to SYSTEM.
--
Jindroush <jindroush@nospam.seznam.nospam.cz>
Remove both 'nospam's from the address to reply.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Color Change - Final Update - Track
|
| (...) It's more than just *my* point of view, it's the law, at least in the US. There is typically no implied warranty of suitability to purpose or fitness that is attached to any good sold here. You would need an express warranty to have any (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Color Change - Final Update - Track
|
| (...) Why? I hear the WHINE, but I'm not hearing the WHY. WHY is this important, compared to other things (assume you're making a priority list here) Track varies in color in real life. It just *doesn't* make a high priority list of things in my (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
260 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
