 | | Re: Minifig heads
|
| (...) I thought it was so they didn't scare children with beheaded minifigs (legless minifigs presumably being deemed less harrowing.) Psi (21 years ago, 19-Apr-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: Minifig heads
|
| (...) Then why don't they put on the minifigs' neckwear, such as capes? Having to pull off Harry's head to put on his cape is scary. My 9-year-old daughter still asks me to do that for her. /Eric M/ (21 years ago, 19-Apr-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: Minifig heads
|
| (...) The cloth capes I can completely understand them shipping seperately, since they box them up for protection. If they attached them to the minifig torsos, they'd be all mangled up when you open the box, and that's no good. (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: Minifig heads
|
| (...) Of course that is why, although I think that problem is solvable. However, you took my comment out of context. I was asserting that if they left the head attached to the torso out of concern for young children seeing headless torsos, then they (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: Minifig heads
|
| (...) The true irony here is that I started to explain a reason for why the heads are still attached, but I got halfway through it and decided that it was superfluous to the cape bit, so I trimmed that part out. (...) I suspect it might have (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.lego)
| |
