 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Despite of the "blay-desaster" it is still one of the best toys on market. (...) More products like the designer sets. More spare parts. More lines that last for more than 2 years. (As town and castle did in the 80ies) (...) Return (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes, I would. Actually, I am buying lots of Lego for my own child (which will be born around july 1st) and for several other children. (...) Because I believe that apart from the play value of Lego, the building system helps children to (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) For the same reasons I buy it for myself: It's a quality & fun product that encourages creativity and thinking. (...) As a fan of LEGO Technic, I'd say: more "features" - more things moving and acting like the real-world objects. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: On sale or not on sale
|
|
(...) If the words "On sale" were not present I would not be concerned, that is right. (...) I am aware of that, I was calling it a K10022 set, calling it a bundle is a bether word. (...) I do not agree with you on this one. You say: "The lower (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes, if I was buying toys for someone 0-11, I would definatly consider lego. (...) Because there is some good products on the shelves at the moment. (...) Change the focus away from things that emphasize play and back to sets that emphasize (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
