 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Despite of the "blay-desaster" it is still one of the best toys on market. (...) More products like the designer sets. More spare parts. More lines that last for more than 2 years. (As town and castle did in the 80ies) (...) Return (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes, I would. Actually, I am buying lots of Lego for my own child (which will be born around july 1st) and for several other children. (...) Because I believe that apart from the play value of Lego, the building system helps children to (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) For the same reasons I buy it for myself: It's a quality & fun product that encourages creativity and thinking. (...) As a fan of LEGO Technic, I'd say: more "features" - more things moving and acting like the real-world objects. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: On sale or not on sale
|
|
(...) If the words "On sale" were not present I would not be concerned, that is right. (...) I am aware of that, I was calling it a K10022 set, calling it a bundle is a bether word. (...) I do not agree with you on this one. You say: "The lower (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes, if I was buying toys for someone 0-11, I would definatly consider lego. (...) Because there is some good products on the shelves at the moment. (...) Change the focus away from things that emphasize play and back to sets that emphasize (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Y (...) They are fun toys, and they are also educational, as they teach kids to solve 3-dimensional problems encountered in building and to apply their ideas to the physical world. (...) More Lego parts that are fully compatible with existing (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote: (snip) (...) Yes (...) Kids love LEGO products, even if they don't know it yet. (...) A parts list in the set, like some of the Designer sets have. Instructions for multiple models Instructions for models (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes, I am buying Duplo right now. (...) I have to start corrupting my nephew as young as possible to keep him away from video games. (...) More fan interaction - the US Truck Tours have *always* made a good local splash. Use those tours for (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes. I have in the past, and I'm sure I will in the future. (...) The best toy makes the best gift. (...) I'd like to say, "I would give people the opportunity to upload CAD models and then have them made and buy them in real life," but that's (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) HOLY MACKEREL! Again. As of now it has been about 16 hours since Jake Posted the "It's Broke" message yet the survey entrance at LegoFan.org has NOT been changed to reflect that. I hope someone with site access can change LegoFan.org to relay (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
