 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) The above is not just the DMAS (Dave Mutual Admiration Society) speaking, there are a lot of other people on LUGNET that feel the very same way, myself included. (...) I totally agree with this, well said, Dave! (22 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) Hey now, there's no need for that. Dave K can speak for himself, but what the heck--I can speak for himself, too. Regardless of his national origins, I have always found Dave K to be honest and forthright. He is willing to admit when he is (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) There was no promise! Stop saying that! Stop spinning this! At the time Jake said what he said, that's *exactly* what was going on--TLC had some leftover Maersk Blue pellets and no contract with Maersk Blue to warrant making more. Those are (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) You may be a man of your word but you have 'selective interpretation' down to a science. If you want to debate the facts, I'm all for it. If you continue to ignore what actually happened, then we're done here. Take care, Dave K (22 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) I sincerely doubt that. I think the AFOLs are much more price-aware that the casual Lego buyer. Even though the posts about FOTW:s (and FOTM:s and FOTY:s) have dwindled here on lugnet, I do believe that the 'typical' AFOL is giving TLC *less* (...) (22 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
|
