 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| exactly... I think Todd did the right thing in responding to LEGO's wishes (formally or informally legal). However, LEGO should have directed this 'problem' at Target - NOT at LUGNET... Just my 2 cents.. Gene (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I just received an email reply from Brad to my earlier message to him today. He reiterated that the original request was a formal legal request and noted that he could not give permission for me to post the contents of the message. He said (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Lego Island
|
| "Mikohl Moree (The Lego Minifig Maniac)" <mikohl2@juno.com> wrote in message news:Fys54C.H80@lugnet.com... (...) System (...) what (...) not in (...) I still have my Lego Island and I even play it once in a while, catching the Brickster and all (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Why would you think TLC haven't already complain to Target also? (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) My primary suggestion is to start with the person who posted the information, rather than talking to Todd first. Don't send a threatening legal letter, but nicely say that Lego prefers to keep that information secret, and and ask the poster to (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
