 | | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
| (...) Yes. (...) Yes I can decisively say that. I think I did already, actually. (...) That kind of information would be covered under the NDA so I can't specifically comment. (...) After dinner the lot of us fested till pretty late, so at 2 AM when (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
| (...) Exxx...xxxcellent. (...) So you know then? (...) MOCs at din? --Todd (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: More Venom Anyone? ( Was Re: Give them a break (was:Hey, like, is anyone there? ))
|
| You know, I've stayed out of this debate for a long time now, though, I can't stand this anymore.. Granted, I've bought some (all) Throwbots, they were interesting when they first came out... a couple Roboriders, (got as b-day presents). Though I'm (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
| (...) My apologies everyone, I totally underestimated the power of the (LEGO)Force. I'm very glad that Trains have a bright future, this has been my lesson in faith. -Harvey (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
| (...) Awesome! I hope all of those who have been whining will think about what happened here, and think about Larry's comments over the past few months about how whining is not the best way to go about things, and consider that this meeting probably (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
