To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / *10077 (-5)
  Re: The Future of Trains
 
(...) Ben, Well said! I couldn't have stated it any better. I too will wait, impatiently I might add, for the reveal on the new system. I trust that if I lack the creativity to make it work, I will do what I always do... Copy from the rest of you. (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
 
  Re: The Future of Trains
 
(...) Well I do. The last 5 years I have build up a huge collection of blue track (both 12 volt and 4.5 volt), as well as trains from that era (1966-1979) and many parts, like motors, train bases, etc. All long after the last production run by TLC (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
 
  Re: The Future of Trains
 
(...) Funny how we as AFOLs have a hard time thinking "outside the box". We automatically assume that new track geometry necessarily requires large sectional track pieces. The old 4.5-volt/12-volt system had separate ties (sleepers in Europe), track (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
 
  Re: The Future of Trains
 
(...) Hey Adam, Will you sell me you 9v stuff? Todd (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
 
  Re: The Future of Trains
 
(...) Also, Add Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) rules that anything using AC power means minimum age 7 on the box, and with Duplo going around age 5, that means a gap in trains from age 5 to 7. The new battery train has a lower age range (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR