|
|
 | | Re: Database integration with LEGO
|
| (...) Nah, just because I like building naked Bionicles now doesn't mean LEGO won't make ‘em. In fact, I optimistically view them as being more precursory than preemptive. ;-) (...) No me! If I buy a 3000 Duplo piece, 10 foot tall scultpure of (URL) (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-05, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Database integration with LEGO
|
| In lugnet.inv, Mike Crowley wrote: (snip) (...) You know, reading your post brought up the idea of pre-emptive MOCs. and UCS Duplo I would seriously consider buying. For my niece, of course! Joe Meno .space paparazzi! (20 years ago, 2-Apr-05, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Database integration with LEGO
|
| (...) Holy kickboxing babies, Batman, that’s some great news! If Peeron and LEGO’s parts inventory databases are intimately linked, and parts lists could be floating around in there for sets on file and awaiting production, might I be able to do an (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-05, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Database integration with LEGO
|
| Ha ha. Funny. (20 years ago, 1-Apr-05, to lugnet.inv)
| | | | | Re: Database integration with LEGO
|
| (...) I was sitting there, nodding my head in agreement, then I realised that YOUR post was posted today too... so should I trust it? I can't decide. XFUT lugnet.off-topic.fun (20 years ago, 1-Apr-05, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.fun, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
