 | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | OOOHHHHHHH... " 'confirmed' "! Sorry, I didn't know that 'confirmed' meant gospel truth...truly, very sorry about that. I took a couple of minutes to trace the posts I believe you are referring to. Excerpts include: "Fortunately, someone posted a (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | (...) Die Harry-Potter-Figuren sollen MINIFIGS sein, keine Creator- oder Belville-Figuren which means "The Harry Potter Figures shall be minifigs, no Creator- or Belville figures." The implication is shall in the English 'will' sense, not the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | judging from the pictures that were mysteriously put on-line..... "not affiliated" with JK Rowlings or with movie producers... I'd say the robes look more like school blazers with house crests on the chest...that's my take on the situation. (23 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | |
