|
|
 | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
| (...) Have you seen the Goblin from the movie? That IS what these sets are based on. My guess is it's removable (i.e. fits over a minifig head). Kevin (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
| (...) It is a good representation, but wouldn't you rather have a minifig head, instead of this helmet thing? Don't get me wrong, though, I see some uses for it. I just think it looks a bit absurd, as well as the frankenstein's monster hat peice (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
| (...) Okay, a little follow-up: A friend showed me a pic, and the minifig head looks like a pretty good representation of the character's head. Is it a bit wide? Sure, but minifigs THEMSELVES are a bit wide. Jeff (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
| (...) It isn't "three times the size of his body." I'd say it is little more than 20% larger than a regular minifig head. I can't comment on how it looks compared to either the movie or the comic, since I have seen neither, nor do I plan to. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
| (...) I realize this, however TLC is responsibe for the Lego sets of the movie, therefore my complaints are directed correctly. I'm sure Sony Entertainment didn't say "Could you make Green Goblin's head three times the size of his body? Thanks." (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
| (...) Since the Spiderman sets are based on the upcomig movie and not the comic, you'll want to direct your complaints there, rather than at Lego. Jeff (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
| Not only are the SW and HP sets looking awesome, but check out the better shots of the Monsters sets! #1380 werewolf ambush: (URL) curse of the pharoah (URL) vampire's crypt (URL) scary lab: (URL) sets look amazing! I'm dying to get my hands on the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
| (...) As far as the quidditch (practise) field...it isn't too bad, and it has enough elements to make it work, if you buy two of them, make the make shift stands, and use some kind of base for the "field". I think the "crabbe and goyle set" will be (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter)
| | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
| Richard, You are right, the Serpent Sheild is awesome. Is that supposed to be the Slytherin Entrance to their dorm room? Also Crabbe, and goyle look great! I saw Madam Hooch. She was kewl! But they could have done better with the Quidditch Field. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter)
| | | | | Chamber of Secrets Sets
|
| Hi all, I don't know if anyone else has seen this, but check out fbtb.net for some pictures of sets from the Chamber of Secrets. Steve (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
|
