 | | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) But a lot of that is simply because most lugnet'ers have been around RTL for awhile, and don't feel the need to rehash old arguments. Steve (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) That may be true. What is also true, though, is that there are specific groups here for discussing specific things. So if a nasty discussion begins those people can always be encouraged to move it to off-topic.debate and keep it out of the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Hey, I'M the topic police. No, seriously -- if a thread is getting out of hand and off-topic, a gentle reminder, or several, with followup-to set, should be sufficient. I don't see a need to retroactively relocate articles. (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Not that necessarily advocating the practice of moving existing messages, but it does help keep the thread intact. Which helps readers follow what's going on. It also _strongly_ encourages new followups to go where the T.P. want them to go. (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
