Subject:
|
Re: A change in attitude: was Big Brother is Watching (and reading, too!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Oct 1999 03:45:10 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIENIAZEK@NOVERA.COMavoidspam
|
Viewed:
|
2028 times
|
| |
|
|
the parts in either one of the AT ATs (and I saw both in the flesh, WOW
IS ALL I CAN SAY (yes I had to shout) ) would be way more than 150, I
would think.
There must have been 3000 elements in either one. Just guessing.
I'd pay 500 for one.
Mike Stanley wrote:
>
> Troy Cefaratti <mnementh@sbase1.com> wrote:
> > I believe the concern is that people will design their OWN sets using the
> > bulk parts, which would undoubtedly be BETTER then the ones Lego is
> > currently still selling.
>
> How much would people pay for David's AT-AT model as a kit? I'm
> thinking $150 minimum. Probably a lot higher.
>
> --
> The parts you want and nothing else?
> http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
> Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
> http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
