| |
In lugnet.admin.general, The Doctor What <docwhat@gerf.org> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 06:15:04AM +0000, Todd Lehman wrote:
> >
> > GOOD LINK: http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=6375-1 (web page)
> >
> > BAD LINK: http://www.lugnet.com/img.cgi?pause/town/lego6375b.jpg (image)
>
> Actually, according to the article posted to me, both are okay *links*.
Yes, both are well-formed URLs, if that's what you mean...?
> Inline images are not okay, because inline images are pulled in automatically
> by most browsers, causing more hits on the image, making the assumption that not
> 100% of the people reading the page want to view the image.
>
> It's pedantic, but I thought it was worth clarifying.
I should clarify what I meant. :-)
In the example labeled "good link" -- offsite links to URLs of that type are
encouraged, and will work fine.
Under the example labeled "bad link" -- offsite links to URLs of that type
are discouraged, and will not work fine whether they're given as a regular
link:
<A HREF="http://www.lugnet.com/img.cgi?pause/town/lego6375b.jpg">pic</A>
or as an embedded/inline image:
<IMG SRC="http://www.lugnet.com/img.cgi?pause/town/lego6375b.jpg">
In other words, any kind of offsite direct-image JPEG links are right out.
--Todd
[followups to lugnet.admin.general]
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Pause Links
|
| (...) Actually, according to the article posted to me, both are okay *links*. Inline images are not okay, because inline images are pulled in automatically by most browsers, causing more hits on the image, making the assumption that not 100% of the (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
