 | | 8448 ramblings —Tim Rueger
|
| | | Here are some musings/reflections/whatever about the 8448. This is really rambly - I suggest trimming the original message if you have any replies. I got my 8448 last Tuesday, and put it together over the course of several evenings (maybe 4-5 hours (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 8448 ramblings —Robert G. Fay
|
| | | | | Tim Rueger <rueger@io.com> wrote in message news:rueger-14089922....io.com... I want to put an RCX in the (...) Check this out. (URL) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 8448 ramblings —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | Don't forget about #5 axles. Those are new for 99 right? btw, the helicopter has tons of them. KL (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 8448 ramblings —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | No, the microTechnic in the UK last year had the 5 length axles, as did at least one Technic set, considering I pulled my chopped axles out of my dragsters and replaced them with real #5 axles, and I did NOT take them out of my UK sets. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 8448 ramblings —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) Yup, many of the 1998 Technic sets had axle #5's, e.g. the 8248, 8417, 8428, 8462 and 8482. Fredrik (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 8448 ramblings —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | Well, since I diddn't buy any 98 Technic sets, I guess that explains my ignorance. Of course I'm always wrong about new parts anyway :) KL (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
