 | | Set names and numbers —Simon Robinson
|
| | | Here's a possible controversial debate... The general convention on lugnet seems to be that sets are referred to by their numbers only in most postings. Now I'm a great fan of Lego - I've spent hours on end poring over old Lego catalogues for the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Set names and numbers —Chris Phillips
|
| | | | | (...) <...snip...> (...) I personally think this would be a great idea. In most situations, the writer will already know the name of the set (it's usually right there on the box next to the number) and they probably will remember the name even when (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Set names and numbers —Paul Baulch
|
| | | | Simon Robinson wrote in message ... [...] (...) Fine by me, but could everyone please keep using the numbers as well, because the names the U.S. use will typically be totally (unfathomably?) different from the names I know the sets by, living (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
