 | | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks —Don Rogerson
| | | | (...) I think it's the higher ratio of piece types to set size that leads him to conclude the sets are not as useful for free-form building as they once were. The argument he makes is that if you have a set of 100 unique pieces, it has less (...) (12 years ago, 1-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks —Brian Davis
| | | | | (...) If the author is worried about maximum variation with minimal parts... go play with Silly-Putty. LEGO is not, at the heart, about combinatorics, it's about creations. Perhaps he should do more building and less math. Or, visit a convention (...) (12 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | |
