Subject:
|
Re: Base plate thickness?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Feb 2008 02:33:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5690 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.general, scott Frischmann wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Rafe Donahue wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, scott Frischmann wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry; That can't be right. More than half an inch? Did you mean 0.055
> > inch?
>
>
> 0.055 inch would be correct. It never crossed my mind that 0.5 = 1/2.
> I don't use my calipers often enough to correctly interpret its output every
> time I do. Lesson learned: Double, uh, no, triple-check the readout (and make
> shure I'm interpreting it correctly).
> If I worked in a machine shop, it would be another story.
Thanks, Scott. That's very helpful. I've got to get me some calipers!
Rafe
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Base plate thickness?
|
| (...) 0.055 inch would be correct. It never crossed my mind that 0.5 = 1/2. I don't use my calipers often enough to correctly interpret its output every time I do. Lesson learned: Double, uh, no, triple-check the readout (and make shure I'm (...) (16 years ago, 5-Feb-08, to lugnet.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread: ![Base plate thickness? -Rafe Donahue (4-Feb-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Base plate thickness? -Ross Crawford (4-Feb-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Base plate thickness? -scott Frischmann (4-Feb-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Base plate thickness? -Rafe Donahue (4-Feb-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Base plate thickness? -scott Frischmann (5-Feb-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|