|
|
 | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) I came in at 8.90 but I could have sworn that I really didn't care that much about mods and other non-traditional things... (URL) (17 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) 0.67/10!? Not shure, but whatever. I really don't mind. (URL) My question is, since most who rated clones 1/5, also rated modding clones 1/5, so if you consider clones a blasphemy, wouldn't modding clones then be a moot point? (17 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) You sure you really want to go down that road around here...? ;-) (URL) (17 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Box scans
|
| (...) <sniper-snip> (...) Of course it is useful, especially the rear side of the box is very important (for the alternate models). You can send it to some database/instructions server, for example Peeron. -Martin (17 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) A fun test! I thnk I came out at about 7.7. It's weird, because we're all so complex, so how do you make a simple test and gett accuate answers? For instance, under the topic of custom weapons, I personally don't use them (while I do own (...) (17 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
|
