 | | Different quality of pictures between different browsers in Brickshelf —Mike Gallagher
|
| | | In Brickshelf and other websites that have a smaller previews for a picture I have notice a low quality pictures in IE and Firefox. (Unless you click on picture you will not see the correct resolution.) I found a few articles on Lugnet that mention (...) (17 years ago, 4-Jul-07, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Different quality of pictures between different browsers in Brickshelf —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | (...) Handy to know. I often wondered why Firefox just uses linear scaling when bicubic is so much better and it looks like Safari has finally done it properly. Let's hope the other browsers pay attention and copy the idea. Of course it doesn't (...) (17 years ago, 4-Jul-07, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Different quality of pictures between different browsers in Brickshelf —Jim DeVona
|
| | | | (...) Another factor may be Safari's color management: (URL) I've always been curious about the way Brickshelf has the browser scale the full sized image to fit the page. You don't see that too often these days. I agree with Tim that unless the full (...) (17 years ago, 4-Jul-07, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Different quality of pictures between different browsers in Brickshelf —Dean Earley
|
| | | | (...) Yes, resampling is costly when using anything other than linear scaling. This was the main reason I had to make my gallery script cache the resampled images, especially when it suddenly has to resample 100 odd images all at once.... (17 years ago, 4-Jul-07, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
