 | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Richie Dulin
|
| | | (...) -snip- Spotlighted. But I can’t really thank you for sharing this one, Janey. I think this sort of thing (especially that you publicised it soo much(1)) is bad press for the AFOL community at large. Tattoos are an adult activity, and carry (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | (...) These are valid concerns. Thanks for this very thoughtful commentary. I'm still getting one though - maybe the Blacktron 2 logo. How bad could drunken sailors really be? Allister (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | WTH! Richie, get the heck out of here. YOUR bad press for the community at large with your constant (*(^&$$*&^%^(*)_*, )(& )*)(&^&*^&$ and I'll show you some bad press for the community at large with some _)*)(&^(&%$&%# of my own! Go beeeyotch about (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Kevin Blocksidge
|
| | | | | | | (...) Gasp! I agree with Eric, what has the world come to?!?!? Richie, it's gotten old. No one cares anymore, if indeed any did to begin with. Give it up. ~Kevoh (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general) !
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | | | (...) Fair enough, Richie's post was perhaps a little bit long-winded, but I really don't see anything there that could be described as "(*(^&$$*&^%^(*)_*, )(& )*)(&^&*^&$". Yes, I suppose it could even be called negative, but only in that he raised (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | | | I know I know, please pardon my outburst. e (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | (...) Richie, I am very sorry I blew up on you. I didn't realize you were goofing around. Again, I apologize. Your post just really rubbed me the wrong way. At that point I really had it up to (there) with the antics of jlugs. Silly silly me. (...) (19 years ago, 22-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Steve Dunn
|
| | | | | In > Spotlighted. But I can’t really thank you for sharing this one, Janey. I (...) Richie, i think this is a matter of opinion and this lugnet being one of the freindliest places on the internet; your negativity, i find; is unwelcome. If people (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Samarth Moray
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.general, Steve Dunn wrote: 3 o-: Legoswami (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Steve Dunn
|
| | | | | | (...) In lugnet.general, Somebody else wrote: I'm not sure how your post adds value to the discussion though. Please be a little more specific as to what your actual concerns are. A string of gibberish is not a compelling argument. Steve (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Samarth Moray
|
| | | | | | (...) In lugnet.space, a while back, that same guy wrote: (...) s%te#ven.j&.du?nn*@t...*tr$a.c?om ;-) Legoswami (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | (...) You are a 15 year old minor, I am a 35 year old man. Get your parents permission before you continue to post harrasing messeages. Persist and I will have LUGNET admins curtail your privledges. Persist and I will trace your ISP and determine (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | | (...) ....and my own bad spelling! ~blush~ (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Tim David
|
| | | | | | | (...) If he lived a country where the age of majority was 15, would you still consider him a minor? (I don't think it is 15 in India BTW) Tim (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I had a great-uncle who was a 15 year-old miner before The Great Depression, if that helps. At least, I hear that he was great. Dave! (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Tim David
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Actually, as he has said, he is 17. In the UK certainly, that would make him not a minor (for a lot of things anyway*, confusing world that it is :) ) Tim *Allowed to get married and serve in the army, but not to buy alcohol or vote (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ah, but if he were English, he would have to ask his mum for permission to marry... us Scots are a little more liberal in that respect. If he were English, he'd also not want me to say this: (URL) NI 1 :Eng(er)land 0>... so I won't! Scott A (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | | Ok, so perhaps breaking out the SWAT Team is a little over dramatic. Boy was I an ogre last night. Well anyway goodmorning. Please consider this message a request to just lay off. I think the same goes for me. Issue compounding issue, post upon (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | | | | Besides, think to yourself, what would "Kelly McKiernan" do in this position! e (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) You said it. (...) I think it goes double for you, eric. I was quite enjoying this thread until you stormed in in all your jack-booted glory. Frankly, Samarth's contributions to this thread have been entirely harmless compared to yours. But, (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Pete White
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Senior Wardens Against Teabagging (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Samarth Moray
|
| | | | | | | (...) That's 17, actually. (...) Harassing? Ya, ok. But-- Allow me to set the record straight. (sorry to spoil the fun for everyone who hasn't read anything here yet) For anyone who has read Richie's post, may note that it is in fact a (URL) (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Threats against Minors Re: Janey's tattoo —Kevin Blocksidge
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Eric made similar threats toward me awhile back. After consulting with folks who were, at the time, LUGNET admins, I determined that his threats were entirely empty. And even if he had gone so far as to call my parents, I imagine they would (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, FTX) !
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Threats against Minors Re: Janey's tattoo —Samarth Moray
|
| | | | | | | | In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote: ROFLMFAO!!!!! (...) Add to that the phone number of someone in another country (which is what my case would be) and things really start sounding weird, don't they? LOL. (...) Well, *I* was planning on being (...) (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 35 year old man (was: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough) —Tony Alexander
|
| | | | | | (...) ??? Age-ism? Or smacka-lacka? YOU make the call! I kinda like the interaction amongst different ages, really...I've learned quite a bit by watching the unrestrained creativity of our youngers. So, I'm thinking this was meant as smack. But if (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Richie: Nice contest entry but I don't think it will win. Everyone else: Don't feed the troll. (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX) !
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Nathan Wells
|
| | | | | | | (...) Agreed. 'Nuff said. And now back to building... -- Nathan Wells (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | | (...) Noted. pardon my own negativity, I'm trying to build something cool to share, to at least offer something positive. e There is such a thing as, build to mouth ratio, as there is to lurk and build ratio. Everyone try to help keep this place (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | | | (...) Which is, if I recall correctly, a turn of phrase meaning "your model is weakly executed,and not very funny". What model? Are you referring to Janey's tattoo as being weakly executed and not very funny? Cheers Richie Dulin (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | Richie, please stop. e (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —John Butler
|
| | | | | In lugnet.general, Richie Dulin wrote (...) snip All this about bad press from the guy who made a flying swastika. LOL. Jake (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —James Wilson
|
| | | | | Hypocrite. Don't spotlight it (and brag about it) if you think it's bad press. (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | | | In lugnet.general, Richie Dulin wrote: (snipped a bunch of crap... cause I was laughing so hard I couldn't control the mouse) Thanks Richie, as always you put a perfectly twisted perspective on the entire event. My tat will never be the same. Janey (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Timothy P. Smith
|
| | | | (...) My tatoo artist has a master's degree in art and a hospital-grade autoclave. No iniquity, no danger. And she won't tatoo anybody who's drunk, either. (...) Chicks dig tatoos, man. (...) Always get tattooed in a place you can cover! (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Jason Spears
|
| | | | (...) Actually, I think a brick tattoo would be an excellent way to bring up one's lego hobby with a chick. But then, I'm a geek, so whatdoiknow. -Jason (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —J. Spencer Rezkalla
|
| | | | (...) Potentially better than: "And wraps up the little tour of my house. Do you like it?" "So what's behind that closed door over there?" <glancing nervously at the door to the Lego room> "Ummmm...... stufffff?!" :-) Spencer (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
