Subject:
|
Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:57:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2105 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Richie Dulin wrote:
| |
Tattoo
parlours are dens of iniquity,
|
My tatoo artist has a master’s degree in art and a hospital-grade autoclave. No
iniquity, no danger. And she won’t tatoo anybody who’s drunk, either.
| |
where wide eyed youth, intent on getting a
tattoo of a simple brick or their favourite Bionicle could come face to face
(or face to other parts of the body) with drug dealers, motorcycle gang
members, and even drunken sailors.
|
| |
As your post clearly showed, tattoos are addictive. Imagine if some kid
starts with a simple Bionicle tat, but his interests move on to technic, so
he adds a 1x8 technic brick and a gear or two, and then he gets into
mindstorms, so adds an RCX, and then moves on to trains (adds a Santa Fe
Super Chief) and then to historic 1960’s sets and so on. A body disfigured
for what? Will you comfort him when girls reject him?
|
Chicks dig tatoos, man.
| |
Will you give him a job
when employers reject him?
|
Always get tattooed in a place you can cover!
| |
And you justify your post by saying “At least it’s Lego related”?
Cheers
Richie Dulin
(1) = What happens on JLUG can stay on JLUG - but Lugnet, et al. is a
different story.
|
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
|
| (...) -snip- Spotlighted. But I can’t really thank you for sharing this one, Janey. I think this sort of thing (especially that you publicised it soo much(1)) is bad press for the AFOL community at large. Tattoos are an adult activity, and carry (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
53 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
