 | | Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be. —Samarth Moray
|
| | | (...) Actually you can go further from this premise. I have interesting thoughts going through my mind while sitting in a train for example. Would you count the scenery I see passing by as art? It's about as good as implying EVERYTHING around us is (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be. —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | (...) The original definition of Art is that it is man-made. Specifically, it seperates the world of human made objects (Art) from non-human made objects (Nature). I'd say that any definition of art has to include some manipulation by humans(1) - if (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I think it's commonly accepted that good photography requires skill (composition, framing, choice of speed and exposure) and that the result can be art. Just looking out the window at nature isn't. However I'd say that the trestle you go (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
