 | | Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
|
|
(...) Sure it is. If it's not a *high* point for Ham, he's using the bong incorrectly.(1) (...) Art is in the eye of the beholder. If a piece does the things that art is supposed to do (instill emotion, make one think, make one wonder) it's art. (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
|
|
(...) Actually you can go further from this premise. I have interesting thoughts going through my mind while sitting in a train for example. Would you count the scenery I see passing by as art? It's about as good as implying EVERYTHING around us is (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
|
|
(...) Its no coincidence that our community is growing and we're reaching more of the public at the same time art has taken this cultural swing. Pop Surrealism incorporates a number of different media-- one of my favorites is the new trend in vinyl (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
|
|
(...) The original definition of Art is that it is man-made. Specifically, it seperates the world of human made objects (Art) from non-human made objects (Nature). I'd say that any definition of art has to include some manipulation by humans(1) - if (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
|
|
(...) I think it's commonly accepted that good photography requires skill (composition, framing, choice of speed and exposure) and that the result can be art. Just looking out the window at nature isn't. However I'd say that the trestle you go (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
