Subject:
|
Re: Original vs. Copy: Printed Lego Items
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 May 2005 01:48:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
676 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Gerhard R. Istok wrote:
> I received a 1964 Danish catalog from a European collector recently. Since I
> got if for free (after buying some other items), I thought it was great. The
> one sheet (two sided) catalog is in such great condition, I was wondering if it
> wasn't a photocopy. (It seemed more like copier paper than old Lego catalog
> paper.) I know that scanned items can be detected as copies by looking at the
> items with a powerful magnifying glass, and seeing the dots or pixels. But I am
> not familiar with photocopied items. Do they too have those "dots" when
> magnified like scans off a dot matrix printer?
Depends on the copier. Most cheaper modern copiers use a digital printer-style
engine to generate the copies, so you will see the pixelation at high
magnification. However older ones transferred the image non-digitally, and many
newer copier-only models also still do, i believe. I'm not sure whether the
magnifying glass would help you identify copies from them.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Original vs. Copy: Printed Lego Items
|
| I received a 1964 Danish catalog from a European collector recently. Since I got if for free (after buying some other items), I thought it was great. The one sheet (two sided) catalog is in such great condition, I was wondering if it wasn't a (...) (19 years ago, 13-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
