 | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? —Marc Nelson Jr.
| | | | (...) snip You can get the justification for the Spotlight weights (URL) here> and (URL) here>. This bit strikes me as particularly absurd: These can be tweaked as necessary. And will be, if we can't get spotlighting to highlight what we believe (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? —Shaun Sullivan
| | | | | | (...) Thanks, Marc. That helps my understanding of the current scheme ... Shaun (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) I agree! IF everyone that cared about what hits the spotlight list consistently highlighted (or didn't highlight) things, you would be absolutely correct. (...) Right... We don't. BECAUSE, based on user comments, which we listen to carefully, (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | | |
