 | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | (...) (URL) recent LEGO press release> might help clarify. From what I understand, "LEGO" is actually a group of different entities tied together by one or more holding companies, which are in turn owned by the founding family. To consolidate (...) (20 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —Brian Kendig
|
| | | | To add to the confusion... I emailed Lego through the form on their web site, and asked: "What is the difference, exactly, between The LEGO Group and The LEGO Company? Would you please give me a specific definition of what each term refers to?" The (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —Jake McKee
|
| | | | (...) You'd think :) Actually, the background comes down to legal and tax issues. As I understand each country office/branch is a separate "company". So in Billund, it's LEGO A/S. In Enfield, it's LEGO Systems, Inc., etc. I don't know the specifics (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | "Jake McKee" <sink@countersinkdg.com> wrote in message news:IDGJJE.1or5@lugnet.com... (...) Kinda like Prince, that became the unpronounceable symbol (the artist formerly known as Prince), and then Prince again? Rob www.brickmodder.net (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —James Trobaugh
|
| | | | | | (...) That's enough out of you Rob; there always seems to be one "smartass" in the group...LOL! jt (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | | "James J. Trobaugh" <james@ngltc.org> wrote in message news:IDGKMy.1xzF@lugnet.com... (...) Oh, pardon my intrusion into your territory Mr. Trobaugh... :P r (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —James Trobaugh
|
| | | | | | (...) That's Ambassador Trobaugh to you mister! :) jt (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Power Corrupts! Didn't take long, did it, JT! you don't see ME going around insisting people use my many titles, do you? Didn't think so. Help, I'm being oppressed! ++Lar (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@...e.DOT.com> wrote in message news:IDGyDp.oH5@lugnet.com... (...) Um, you're professional titles or the ones we use here....err, the ones we can't use here in fear of breaking the ToU? :-P --Rob (20 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Bloody peasant. That would be "repressed". Sorry to get all pendantic (sic) on your butt, but that's one of my favs. Incidently, my daughter was lucky enough to be in NYC last weekend and see "Spamelot" with Hank Azaria et al. I would take (...) (20 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —Scott Lyttle
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, and LEGO Brand Retail is separate from Shop@Home. There's a tax rule out there between having an online store and that same company having a retail store regarding taxes. Bottom line, If Shop@Home and Brand Retail were part of the same (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
