Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf gallery categories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:51:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1424 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tim David wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Tim David wrote:
> > Would it be possible for the Brickshelf moderators to make sure the categories
> > are reasonable when moderating galleries. There seems to be an increase in
> > galleries that look like the owner has just ticked every box, for exaple this
> > one http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=83226 which currently
> > appears in the Train recent galeries list (please note, I am not commenting on
> > the quality or validity or any other thing of this gallery). Its definately not
> > train related, not really even as scenery.
> >
> > Tim
>
> Just thought I'd bump this again (flogging a dead horse springs to mind!)
> another example, picked at random,
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=56518 . Nice models, but of a
> CAR, so why is the folder in the new Trains folder?
Also, it would be nice if a Robotics category were added (IMO, Technic isn't
appropriate in many cases).
Thanks,
Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brickshelf gallery categories
|
| (...) Just thought I'd bump this again (flogging a dead horse springs to mind!) another example, picked at random, (URL) . Nice models, but of a CAR, so why is the folder in the new Trains folder? Tim (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.general)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
