Subject:
|
Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:39:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3099 times
|
| |
|
|
Terry Prosper wrote:
> > Yeah, but if we have _defined_ environment (I mean there is _finite_
> > number of all LEGO sets out there), the final result _must_ be same. So
> > I don't see the need for competition. Of course, there may be
> > differences in 'value added', better pictures, more fields, different
> > presentation, but the core data _is_ same by the definition.
>
> My point exactly. No need for a third website copying the 2 already existing.
No, my point is: why to have two sets of data? I don't mind if two sites
use the same data, but I'd like to see one centralized database.
> > But the shared database would be great - for example, I would like to
> > give Czech users something like {very limited} guide.lugnet or Brickset.
> > I don't have enough resources to do it. But it's not a problem for me to
> > make czech ui, and create add-on xml databases with czech set names,
> > czech MSRPs and czech release dates.
>
> So why not work with Huw and Todd and make the already existing websites better?
Wasn't it told in previous debate about WorldLUG, that Lugnet doesn't
evolve anymore? Not to mention that it's a 'private property'.
I have no problem contributing to 'open' projects, though.
--
Jindroush <jindroush@nospam.seznam.nospam.cz>
Remove both 'nospam's from the address to reply.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
208 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
