To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 45419
45418  |  45420
Subject: 
Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:19:30 GMT
Viewed: 
4900 times
  
In lugnet.general, Jindrich Kubec wrote:
> Huw Millington wrote:
> > > What's the difference between guide on Lugnet and BrickSet? Isn't that
> > > just a mere duplication? [snip]
> > Competition is always a good thing...
> 
> Yeah, but if we have _defined_ environment (I mean there is _finite_
> number of all LEGO sets out there), the final result _must_ be same. So
> I don't see the need for competition. Of course, there may be
> differences in 'value added', better pictures, more fields, different
> presentation, but the core data _is_ same by the definition.

My point exactly.  No need for a third website copying the 2 already existing.

> > Of course, if LEGOFan.net provides high quality images and information on
> > every set produced since the year dot including promotional, regional and
> > other rare sets, and produces it in a timely manner on or before set
> > release, I'll be happy to throw in the towel, or maybe adapt Brickset to
> > take its data from a XML web service or whatever else is provided by
> > LEGOfan.net
> 
> The _cooperation_ is the thing LEGOFan.net (or WorldLUG) talks about,
> methinks. There would be no need for you to 'throw in the towel'. You'd
> just continue in your (BTW very good) work, but just share it with the
> others. This would bring problems, of course. It's the thing I see in
> LDraw community - it's full of standards, voting commitees etc.
> resulting in slow updates and 'unofficial' parts ;) The database
> wouldn't be 'yours' anymore and the write access to it by different
> parties would have to be solved somewhat, to avoid the quality drop.
> 
> But the shared database would be great - for example, I would like to
> give Czech users something like {very limited} guide.lugnet or Brickset.
> I don't have enough resources to do it. But it's not a problem for me to
> make czech ui, and create add-on xml databases with czech set names,
> czech MSRPs and czech release dates.

So why not work with Huw and Todd and make the already existing websites better?
I have yet to see a good thing come of this debate.

Terry



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) No, my point is: why to have two sets of data? I don't mind if two sites use the same data, but I'd like to see one centralized database. (...) Wasn't it told in previous debate about WorldLUG, that Lugnet doesn't evolve anymore? Not to (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) [snip] (...) Yeah, but if we have _defined_ environment (I mean there is _finite_ number of all LEGO sets out there), the final result _must_ be same. So I don't see the need for competition. Of course, there may be differences in 'value (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)

208 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR