|
|
 | | To Thomas Stangl (positive stuff)
|
| Hey Tom, this is Nick. After reading over the various posts, I still stand by my "my comment was stupid" post and think that the whole argument was stupid anyway. Lets just forget about it. I can actually see your point of view. Truce? Thanks, ~Nick (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating
|
| (...) Oh, come now. Read all my posts on Lugnet. Not just the ones in .debate or just this thread, ALL of them. Then come back and tell me I like to see how much trouble I can stir up. -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating
|
| (...) I've flamed very few people on Lugnet. Maybe you just have a sore spot because you were one of them? (...) Well, we agree on something else. I find you too obnoxious for words too. Of all the people on Lugnet I ignore, Scott is the #1 on the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating
|
| (...) Yay, great, a Believer!... (...) Hrm, uh, er, maybe not... (...) Yay, he Believes again!... (...) Nevermind, he's degenerated into calling me insane... NOTE: ;-) END NOTE. I'm politically incorrect, but progressive (I consider Political (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Obnoxious geekdom
|
| (...) You have no idea just how high the scale goes, you should see some of the things people have showed me over the years. I was pretty impressed by the Palm OS BrikWars calculator, and then there was a guy who made a Java app that let you play (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
