 | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) Tough question. A leak is an item of information that is NOT meant to be released. Most, if not all of your examples that you cited were meant to be released to, at least initially, to the dealers who sell LEGO. As such, I wouldn't list these (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) Hi Joe - I believe a dealer catalog, obtained by and scanned by an individual who is not a dealer and placed on the internet would constitute a leak. I recall being at LEGO's office in NYC a couple years ago and having to almost beg for a (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) hm...hadn't thought of that. You're right. No wonder I got the confidentiality form when I got my job:) Joe Meno (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) Well (I do not post this as an argument for or against in the discussion), that seems to be exactly what has happened now. All sets not available to the general public yet, have been taken off the Marz Distribution site. With friendly (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) Didn't that happen last year as well? Pedro (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) I don't know. I didn't notice something last year. But if it did happen, and they it was banned by TLC in 2002, it seemds very strange that they would have made the same mistake this year. With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| |
