 | | Re: Hope to help, edify and soothe, but probably won't
|
| (...) I have no idea how I'd 'feel', but here's what I'd think: "Looks like the bandwidth bills got to be too much. Sad, but it's time to move on." Come to think of it, Brickshelf sometimes hasn't been there before. I can't imagine the effort (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Hope to help, edify and soothe, but probably won't
|
| (...) <lil' snippage> First, let me say thank you to Dave K., who I think wrote a wonderful post at the beginning of this thread. Then Justin wrote... (...) This may be true with regards to the specific sites mentioned. It does give me reason to (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Hope to help, edify and soothe, but probably won't
|
| (...) Agreed--this is the obvious part. I have a personal website that's been up since '94 and continues to be up only at the auspices of, well, me. Why do I have a website up? There's never been a consensus on that one ;) It'll stay up until, (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Hope to help, edify and soothe, but probably won't
|
| (...) We've thought about this before in rtlToronto between Chris and I and neither of us think it's enough of an issue to have some sort of "business continuity plan". If either of us aren't interested in it anymore, we figure someone else in (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
