 | | Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion... —Adrian Drake
|
| | | (...) I know that a great many people use Brickshelf for image deep linking (myself included). The bandwidth demands for a site with as many pictures as Brickshelf can be pretty impressive for someone who has to pay for bandwidth. As an example, (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion... —Erik Olson
|
| | | | If only there was some way to donate unused bandwidth. I've paid for up to 400MB/day for 2 years on pair and filled about 25 of it on average. I would hate to have a surprise 5GB day to pay for though. Some kind of cgi that would serve only x copies (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion... —Ben Roller
|
| | | | (...) Doesn't Pair drop the busiest day? I don't think it would be very ethical or practical, but we could have brickshelf rotate each day between each of our accounts and not have to worry about it again. :) Ben Roller (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
