| |
I myself lurk most of the time. I usually only post a reply if my opinions
have not already been expressed by someone else.
I am also not as elegant with words. (it's better to be quiet and let
people think you're not smart, than to speak and prove it.)
Mark M.
At 10:53 PM 12/15/02 +0000, John Henry Kruer wrote:
> I've noticed a big change in feedback here. In the 'old' days of Lugnet,
> every post would get responded, even a tiny model would generate a large
> thread of discussion.
>
> Now, feedback and people who give them seems to be divided into two groups:
> those who always give feedback and those who rarely give feedback. Now, I
> know that some people don't have the time to post feedback, but I mean,
> things used to be a lot different. Maybe people just lost the initial
> enthusiasim of Lugnet?
>
> Most models or ideas often get maybe 1 or 2 or 3 replies, but then when a
> particullar person or a particullar idea/fad posts, instantly, within
> minutes, bunches of people start replying, and the original poster gets five
> or ten or fifteen replies.
>
> Sometimes this rule is broke in extremely good ideas/models, but often I see
> a model that I love and is really well built- and it gets 1 or 2 replies, as
> if nobody bothered to see it.
>
> What's you're opinion on feedback? Do you lurk, and sometimes post
> responces to extraordinary things? Or do believe everybody should get
> feedback, just because? Do think feedback is better in quantity or quality?
> Do you value of particullarly long, detailed, well-written posts over five
> short, 'That's nice. bye' posts?
>
> I'm cross-posting this to .space, because that's the place I hang out the
> most, and is a bit quiet lately anyway.
>
> -JHK
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
