 | | Re: Why is Lugnet so quiet these days? —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | (...) I'm sure the masses are still reading occasionally. As less is posted less is posted then less is posted. The big flamewars of early '02 has ended and that is a good thing. I think Lugnet has become a more firendly place again. I sure hope it (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why is Lugnet so quiet these days? —Daniel Barrett
|
| | | | | (...) I agree, as an occasional poster that bit of nastyness sent me deeper into lurk mode. I still visit Lugnet 6 days a week and read alot of posts but I don't add much to the community. Maybe someone should take role call for all the regular (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why is Lugnet so quiet these days? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) I note that posting's down across all the boards I happen to frequent. Mayhaps there is truth in the rumour that this internet thingy is just a fad and the thrill is waning... Goodbye internet--putting ya in the closet with the hula hoop and (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Why is Lugnet so quiet these days? —James Stacey
|
| | | | | | "David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:H6pCrH.1pA@lugnet.com... (...) fad (...) yo-yo. (...) 'em (...) Nah its not a fad. A fad implies it was popular to begin with :) -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why is Lugnet so quiet these days? —Bob Parker
|
| | | | (...) That would be me! drooooool :-))) - Bob (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
