Subject:
|
Re: Sith Infiltrator Comments
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 May 1999 15:29:50 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
c576653@cclabs.missouri.SPAMCAKEedu
|
Viewed:
|
77 times
|
| |
|
|
Ben Fleskes wrote:
>
> Finally opened this set and checked it out. I have a possible explanation
> for what happened with the Sith Infiltrator. The biggest problem seems to be
> the width of the nose. It looks like they made it wider to increase play
> value. With the wider nose, there is room for Darth's double bladed light
> saber and those black bombs,droids or whatever they are (1x1 bloated rounds
> with antennas on top). So they sacrificed realism for playability. Sound
> feasible.
I've dubbed it the duck-billed TIE interceptor. A colleague pointed out
that it looks like what a kid would make if given a TIE set and and
X-wing set both missing all clear pieces. I think it's basically the
lamer of these new SW sets.
--
Sincerely,
Christopher L. Weeks
central Missouri, USA
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Sith Infiltrator Comments
|
| Finally opened this set and checked it out. I have a possible explanation for what happened with the Sith Infiltrator. The biggest problem seems to be the width of the nose. It looks like they made it wider to increase play value. With the wider (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
