| |
"Jake McKee" <jacob.mckee@america.lego.com> wrote in message
news:H5L4GC.DqG@lugnet.com...
[ ... snipped ... ]
>
> As you all noticed, we are pre-moderating the comments, meaning nothing • goes
> live without passing by human eyes. We are trying to provide a safe haven
> for discussion for kids of all ages...0-99! We are still getting the hang
> of the moderation, and that first "off-topic" line shouldn't have been
> deleted. However, what we can't do is allow personal information of any • type
> to be uploaded. There is *way* too much risk involved with that when
> dealing with children.
>
> That being said, I have really gone to the mats to ensure that we aren't
> "censoring" posts, but rather simply removing cuss words and personal
> information...all things that don't meet the Terms and Conditions. If the
> post would require a great deal of changes to be able to go live, we will
> simply reject it and have users try again.
>
> (For more information on what is allowed, please refer to the Terms and
> Conditions all users agree when logging into the site the first time,
> and/or the posting guidelines accessible via the link on the "Add • Comment"
> page)
>
> There was also some questions about timing of moderation. We are trying to
> moderate posts as fast as possible. We are still working out the details • of
> what we accept and reject, so bear with us for a short while as we get • this
> process solidified.
[ ... snipped ... ]
I still have one post that is waiting approval, it has been about 24 hours
now since I posted it.
I assume that the reason for the non-approval is due to the links to the
LUGNET Set Guide I referenced in my post.
My first post was approved but "edited" beforehand. It too had a link to
the LUGNET Set Guide. The link was remove from what was actually posted on
the board.
I went and reviewed the ToS and it doesn't expressly state that off-site
links are prohibited.
In my case, the point I was trying to make is greatly enhanced by being able
to see a picture of the set I am referring to. I suspect that many of the
users of the message board will not be as familiar with the older set
numbers as some of us insane people here on LUGNET. If I say the 725 Basic
Building Set should be the next legend, unless you know what I am talking
about, you have no idea why I think it is such a good set.
Jake - can you clarify your policy on including links on the message board?
Mik
FUT: lugnet.lego.direct
--
Mike Walsh - mike_walsh at mindspring.com
http://www.ncltc.cc - North Carolina LEGO Train Club
http://www.carolinatrainbuilders.com - Carolina Train Builders
http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=mpw - CTB/Brick Depot
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Message boards on LEGO.com?
|
| (...) You are right, your post was edited to exclude the URL. I am still working out what the external URL policy is, and will add it to the ToS and post here as soon as it is resolved. As far as the editing, what do you all think? Would you prefer (...) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Message boards on LEGO.com?
|
| (...) Message Boards! Allow me to clarify a few things and answer a few questions raised. We "soft-launched" the boards on Tuesday afternoon, meaning we aren't promoting them like crazy yet, just to verify that the functionality is working like we (...) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
